Sounds like Bostin Loyd is a huge “fan” of the new division.
Bodybuilding is an interesting sport indeed. So many fans and athletes have their own fair share of opinions on the sport. Which division is the best? Is aesthetics more important than muscle? Are mass monsters the best kind of bodybuilders or should we return to the days of old? You’ll hear a ton of different arguments that, as you can see, range from a ton of different subject matters. It seems that the latest hot button issue that many are latching onto is whether or not Classic Physique is a category that is needed in bodybuilding.
[wptouch target=”mobile”]
[wptouch target=”non-mobile”]
Many professional athletes have their own opinions on the category, quite a few actually pleased to see it’s inclusion into the sport. But there are a great many who believe the new division isn’t truly needed in the sport. One such individual is the always outspoken and controversial Bostin Loyd. Recently Loyd took to his Facebook page to give a rant of just what he thinks about Classic Physique and the state of modern day bodybuilding. From the sounds of things, Loyd is none too pleased with the direction the sport is heading in.
While many may completely agree or disagree with Loyd, the truth of the matter is that the man is entitled to his opinion. In a day and age where people crave transparency and the truth we can’t deny Loyd the right to speak his mind on the issue. Classic Physique could truly be a great opportunity for many bodybuilders who believe in a separate philosophy on how the human body should be built to reach perfection. For now, we’ll just have to wait and see how things play out and discover if the new division is a godsend or completely unnecessary.
[wptouch target=”mobile”]
[wptouch target=”non-mobile”]
[wptouch target=”mobile”] [/wptouch]
[wptouch target=”non-mobile”][/wptouch]
Do you agree with Bostin Loyd or do you think he’s missing the point?
Let us know by hitting up our comments below or head on over to our official Facebook and Twitter.
