It’s an age old question that needs to be addressed.
It’s an argument that has been raging ever since the UFC first introduced the masses to mixed martial arts in 1993. The event saw fighters from different disciplines travel from all over the world to prove which martial arts was the best. The concept was straight out of a Jean-Claude Van Damm movie. It was insane to think that such a wild scenario would eventually transform into one of the fasting growing sports of the 21st century. In terms of combat sports, boxing was once the only option we had as fans of pugilism. With the introduction of MMA it gave fans of other styles something to appreciate. For boxing purist it gave them a new sport to scrutinize. Now you may have read that title and expect to see a technical breakdown on the difference between the two martial arts disciplines and philosophies. Maybe it’s something I’ll touch on at some point, but for now this is more of a response to a recent boxing match announcement than anything else. In April, IBF and WBA Middleweight champion Gennady “GGG” Golovkin will be battling a man not named Canelo Alvarez. 











